Featured Posts

Half Way through the Tour - Check out great music from... Friends! We are overwhelmed by the response of people on the Harvest Field Tour… (search on Facebook for more information). To speak about the spiritual situation in Sweden and to awaken awareness about it is one of the major objectives of the tour… Our desire is to build partnerships with individuals, churches and organizations to further the cause of church planting...

Read more

Steve Anderson from converge world wide our wonderful... Download now or watch on posterous IMG_0133.MOV (5253 KB) Skickat från min iPhone

Read more

THE HARVEST FIELD TOUR - arrived in Minneapolis and... We have had some major problems with our telephones and internet connection with the homepage therefore we have not been able to put in yet another film in our blog... Here some glimpses of our trip. Yesterday a greta meeting with 800+ students and faculty in Bethel. God spoke to a number of people and we pray and hope that some of them will be used by God to make a...

Read more

Why I don’t (yet) believe in the restoration of Ted... I have been following the Haggard story from the very beginning of his ministry and I really appreciated his book “The life giving church” – I still like the book. Truth is truth no matter who speaks it out, independent of their circumstances. I posted articles on my former blog and wrote about Ted and the scandal that was unfolding as he was "caught" in contact...

Read more

Now regular updates on church planting, stockholm,... Follow us (and me) on this blog and follow our trip throughout USA by subscribing to this blog! Download now or watch on posterous IMG_0086.MOV (4507 KB) Skickat från min iPhone

Read more

Leadership and Truth: Benny Hinn questioned in Sweden and the Word of Life Church after his sermon! (Livets Ord).

20

Category : Church, Featured, global, Jesus Christ, justice, leadership, lifestyle, mission, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Are we looking for ecstatic experiences, super-natural kicks or are we looking for God Himself?  The other day as I wrote about the stepping down of Litorin I wrote a blog about the importance of integrity in leadership. Leadership in general whether Christian or non-Christian, is first of all about integrity, as I today write about Benny Hinn and his leadership I cannot avoid writing about Truth!

Latest last night as an old friend asked me whether I was planning to go and listen (see) Benny Hinn, my response was: “That is the last thing I would do.” I have seen and read too much about Benny Hinn and his lifestyle contrary to what Scripture teaches. And until now I have not even addressed his teachings and praxis.

Lately there has been much discussion about Benny Hinn here in Sweden (here, here, here, here, here, ) because of the invitation of Livets Ord, (The Word of Life Church) led by Ulf Ekman. Different aspects have been addressed in this discussion; the fact that he is in the middle of a divorce- situation with his wife with whom he has been married 22 years without taking a time-out form his ministry. But other voices address his teaching, his showmanship as he ministers, and of course his prosperous, affluent lifestyle where money never seems an issue.

I know there are always controversies over people who are influential, because by nature many of us are jealous, competitive and arrogant and cannot accept that someone is better or more-liked than we are.

But in the midst of this process we have some new, hard facts about Benny’s teachings, which made even his friend Ulf Ekman, react clearly.  What I like about Ulf is his willingness to confront Benny about these things, what I don’t like is that he didn’t do it publicly at the meeting after Benny’s sermon as he only told the conference participants to go home and check what they heard with their Bibles.


The other day I found out that news articles (rumours?) would be released (Aug 2) about a special romantic relationship of Benny Hinn with Paula White, another television preacher, in the National Enquirer a gossip magazine in the US although, at that moment, the Swedish bloggers and press had not caught up on the story, I decided to not write about it as the information and the trustworthiness of the magazine could be questioned. Both Benny and Paula White have written on their websites to denounce this relationship. It is clearly from reading their responses that they have synchronized their views and stories as they almost use similar wording in their statements.

Anyway, now Ulf Ekman is questioning Benny in an in-depth blog that he wrote today. I will freely translate some of Ulf’s perspectives that are important for this subject.

After a long introduction writing how Benny’s ministry has touched the lives of so many people and Ulf’s experiences of this in many conferences he says:

Having said all of this, I must say that in all the meetings where I have been with him, I have never before heard what he said and taught here (Uppsala, Sweden) yesterday. His teachings, and he is not alone in those, seem to be more developed and worked through by him more than by any other person, went way beyond that which I believe to be classical Christian faith and healthy teaching. It had not only Gnostic influences; it had unfortunately intersections with pure Gnosticism.

On Saturday night it started off well as Benny spoke about the Holy Spirit as a person, not only as a power. But soon the address moved away from the focus and became speculative as he addressed pre-adamitical races and an earlier fall into sin. It became more complicated as he moved from the Trinity to the “human trinity”. Our bodies are not only an outer shell, like a glove that we throw off, but it is an essential and integrated part of our identity and personality. We should not devaluate the importance of the body. We are not a spirit in contrast to our body. We are a spirit, a soul and body, or spirit and flesh, and human’s so-called “trinity” keeps together as a unit, our personality. And we cannot separate this in different isolated compartments. Therefore the resurrection of the body is so important since it is as important as the soul, which Benny mentioned, but only in passing by.

When he finally arrived to Jesus in his sermon he addressed in certain parts a heretic picture of Jesus. The Son was not an eternal Son, the Father was not an eternal Father and it sounded as if there had been a time when the Son didn’t exist. I asked him this right after this meeting and then he denied that and said that he meant that the Son was eternal as Word and first was called “Son” as he came to the earth.

It became more remarkable as he speculated about the fact “that if Jesus had sinned his body would not have been subjected unto decay.” This is important to reprove, because if true, Jesus body was no real body, which leaves us with an incomplete, docetic, and ostensible incarnation. Docetism and the heretic Marcion teaches that the body of Jesus was only an illusion. It was seemingly real, but still not since God will not engage and mix with matter, which is evil. The Christian faith says that the body of Jesus was fully human. If He was not fully human, he could not identify with us ad could not become our replacement and thus we could not be saved.

Later on he shared that Jesus’ blood didn’t come from Mary but directly from God. That’s not true. In Mary and through Mary Jesus humanity was developed and that includes all the parts of his physical body, also his blood. The blood is a part of his physical body and his true human identity…

…It would have been better for Benny to have left out his deep “insights” without making things too difficult for him beyond his capacity and instead have spoken about Jesus in a powerful way which he is able to do and often has done and as an evangelist should do. That would have been enough for us and it is important to fully present the Biblical Jesus.

It seems as if the whole matter becomes a settlement with different Gnostic influences within the Christian faith, but I didn’t believe that we would hear that from Benny Hinn on this particular evening. It was an unpleasant surprise that it came so strongly and so much of it. The fact is that it came and it has therefore to be reproved. In the end it is about salvation, where a illusive, docetic Jesus can not save, which leads to myths and speculations…

Ulf is happy to be Benny’s friend and has confronted him with all the issues addressed above. Now the question is: “will he stand corrected”? Will Benny show his willingness to be interdependent within the Body of Christ and with brothers and sisters (who all sin and who all need forgiveness and correction) and to bow under the Lordship of Jesus as Head?

Or will Benny see this as an occasion where a person “touches the Lord’s anointed” and put a curse on him?

I don’t know what the outcome will be, I hope that he will be able to allow others to speak into his life, not only in this matter but in so many other areas as well so that his life will become a reflection of His Lord:

Phil 2: 3 -8 Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit, but in humility consider others better than yourselves. 4Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others. 5Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus: 6Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, 7but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness. 8And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death— even death on a cross!

Time will tell!

That’s the Way I see it!

John


What does the call to unity stand for? Or, down to earth: where does the rubber meets the road?

Category : Church, leadership, lifestyle, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Dagen reports about an article in the November issue of the Charisma magazine written by Tomas Dixon concerning Ulf Ekman’s involvement with the Catholic Church. Those who know me and the ministries that I have been involved in during the last 25 years know that I have always been an advocate of unity in the body of Christ. Since the beginning of the 80ties I have related and worked for unity across denominational and cultural borders. Even our own church (www.newlife.nu) is an example of that as people from over 40 nations from all kind of different backgrounds, cultures, ages, and languages experience “togetherness” in Christ Jesus in the centre of Stockholm.

A foundational value that has characterized our church and which I have taught from the early stages on is found in the history of the Moravian Movement (by the way, my view on what church is to be is grounded in numerous teachings and praxis from the beginning stages of the Salvation Army, the Moravian Movement, the Anabaptists and the Methodist church). The Moravian Movement declared:”In essential beliefs we have unity. In non-essential beliefs we have diversity. In all our beliefs we show charity.”

For me the teachings of Jesus as found in the New Testament become alive in this quote… It gives me hand and feet to flesh out the unity Christ called for. It helps me understand where the rubber meets the road; with other words how I can implement true unity.

I have always looked for common ground within essential beliefs among those of a Christian tradition and/or background and have made it my core value to speak and live in such way by affirming this common ground. However, if I have to live as I teach there are obvious boundaries or if you will, limitations to what I can stand for.

The Church political climate in Sweden is such that it is hard to step out of line… after many years of divisions, church-cultural and theological misunderstandings and disunity, the ones who consider themselves “Church” have gone into what I would call “survival mode”. Finally we have started to look at the “essentials” but at the same time have overemphasized the “united front outlook” which removes the differences and hot potatoes which still make us different.

I understand Ulf Ekman’s approach after having been isolated from the rest of the “Church” in Sweden in many different ways (isolation, not only because his/their former approach and teachings, but also because of the unwillingness of the rest of us to understand and embrace them).

What do I want to say? I became converted having a non-believing Roman Catholic background with my whole extended network of former friends and family still within that entity (most of them have remained without faith in Christ and the Bible). I worry when I read in the above mentioned article: In April and October evangelicals gathered in Örebro, Sweden’s evangelical center, to caution against the trend and to point out that unity to Catholics always meant, and still means, bowing to the pope. Bishop Arborelius seemed to affirm that view, saying: “We cannot bypass the personal wish of Jesus that all unity must relate to the apostle Peter,” that is to the papal office… Arborelius continued, “I think that [Ekman and others] now see the key role of the pope as a symbol of unity and the importance of the virgin Mary.”

When reading the quotes by Arborelius I react; here we do not speak about unity in regards to the “essentials” of Christian faith as I see it. These statements call me to a hold. Of course we don’t only deal with the Roman Catholic Church; in our nation we are involved with the different Orthodox churches as well which have their uncompromising views on some of these issues also!

I know it is Church Politically incorrect to even dare touch these issues. Honestly speaking, I can have fellowship with friends in the Roman Catholic Church but some of them have views on the essentials of Christian faith that I know would not be endorsed by the Pope. The fact is that if their views would become publically known by the Vatican that they might be asked to leave the church.

So where does your rubber meet the road? I told you some of my journey, what about yours?

That’s the Way I see it (not necessarily the right way!)

John

I am ecumenical in spirit, not in structure!

Category : Church, global, Jesus Christ, leadership, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

The latest article in the Christian Daily on Livets Ord addresses the ecumenical endeavors of the movement, in the same newspaper we read “How three can become one”… (this sounds very Biblical: Three in One!”) where a process is started to unite the Mission-, the Baptist and Methodist churches into one denomination.

There is so much to say about being ecumenical, about Christian unity and about the importance to recognize and respect one another. I come from a non-Bible-believing Catholic background where “Church” was part of the cultural life of people living in the Southern part of Holland. In our village and in most of the Southern part of Holland in those days (the 70ties) Catholicism had a cultural rather then a spiritual impact on the society and the people. Under my upbringing I did not know even ONE true believer among the thousands of people I knew. Later on as I had become a Christian through the Jesus People Movement I met a few true believers; they believed in Christ as their Savior and Lord and in the Bible as their authority. Actually some of them were nuns who would come by taxi to a bible study which I held shortly after my conversion, another believer was the responsible priest in the St. Jan cathedral in ‘s-Hertogenbosch who became a close friend to my wife and me. (He, together with an older evangelist performed our wedding ceremony in the chapel of the hospital where I was working as a nurse at the time).

As the articles show and as we all know there is a movement towards ecumenism in our nation, the Jesusmanifestation was a fruit of that.

Ecumenical, according to Merriam Webster Dictionary means: representing the whole of a body of churches b: promoting or tending toward worldwide Christian unity or cooperation.

However, I need to say that I am not only undivided positive towards this. I identify myself as: “ecumenical in spirit, but not in structure”. With structure I mean the banding of different faiths with different doctrinal statements of truth in form of an organization. I do not believe in that at all, there is a valid reason for organizational separation. I see also an endangering of the absolutes of Scripture. We cannot accommodate everyone and everything. I am totally convinced that Christians who want to accommodate in such ways will soon abandon their beliefs for the sake of unity. Unity is never worth the sacrifice of the authenticity of Scripture! That, in short is my view about structural ecumenism.

In regards to being ecumenical in spirit, I believe that although we are separated denominationally, that there is in fact a “true church” which unites all true believers: Those who have been justified by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, regardless of denominational belonging are already one in Christ and are part of the true Church which is hidden to the human eye.

True Christian believers are always united spiritually as brothers and sisters in Christ despite their denominational belonging or identity. But I do not believe that this will ever express itself in structure here on earth. Because of humankind’s falleness I believe that the true kind of unification will take place as Christ will return to meet His bride (the Church).

I believe strongly in the slogan of the Moravian movement which says:”In essential beliefs we have unity. In non-essential beliefs we have diversity. In all our beliefs we show charity.” This slogan has been my motto since I read about this grant movement, it has permeated the way I think and live and has found its place even in the church where I am pastor. I believe we should work together when possible, but there will continue to be a structural separation because we cannot compromise Truth and accept different doctrines simply in order to have some kind of organizational sameness.

So, I will remain “ecumenical in spirit, but not in structure”.

That’s the Way I see it!

John