Featured Posts

Half Way through the Tour - Check out great music from... Friends! We are overwhelmed by the response of people on the Harvest Field Tour… (search on Facebook for more information). To speak about the spiritual situation in Sweden and to awaken awareness about it is one of the major objectives of the tour… Our desire is to build partnerships with individuals, churches and organizations to further the cause of church planting...

Read more

Steve Anderson from converge world wide our wonderful... Download now or watch on posterous IMG_0133.MOV (5253 KB) Skickat från min iPhone

Read more

THE HARVEST FIELD TOUR - arrived in Minneapolis and... We have had some major problems with our telephones and internet connection with the homepage therefore we have not been able to put in yet another film in our blog... Here some glimpses of our trip. Yesterday a greta meeting with 800+ students and faculty in Bethel. God spoke to a number of people and we pray and hope that some of them will be used by God to make a...

Read more

Why I don’t (yet) believe in the restoration of Ted... I have been following the Haggard story from the very beginning of his ministry and I really appreciated his book “The life giving church” – I still like the book. Truth is truth no matter who speaks it out, independent of their circumstances. I posted articles on my former blog and wrote about Ted and the scandal that was unfolding as he was "caught" in contact...

Read more

Now regular updates on church planting, stockholm,... Follow us (and me) on this blog and follow our trip throughout USA by subscribing to this blog! Download now or watch on posterous IMG_0086.MOV (4507 KB) Skickat från min iPhone

Read more

Hidden brokeness and pain through divorce

3

Category : Featured, global, human rights, justice, lifestyle, Relationships, sverige, Sweden, Uncategorized

Svenska Dagbladet published an article  in the ”Idag” series today about divorce and the effect is has on children. A recently published PhD report suggests that there is no difference in well-being between adults whose parents got divorced while they were a child and adults whose parents did not get divorced. The divorce in itself would not be causing damage to children. The reason that some adults were experiencing difficulties was that there was not enough clarity and communication around the divorce, or not enough time to mourn about the separation before a new partner came into the home.

I understand that it is important for people to know how to get through difficult times and how to behave towards and talk to their children. But what made me very sad is the fact that this research was presented in a way that was basically communicating: “It is no problem to get divorced; this will not affect your children in the long run. Just make sure you do it ´the right way´.”

So how did we get to this point where divorce is presented as an event void of any consequences? I don´t want to be naive to the reality that 55% of all marriages in Sweden do end up in a divorce (the highest rate in the world). And I personally know people that struggle with hurting and unhealthy marriages. But how could we ever take the consequences so lightly? Why are we desperately trying to believe that it is not all that bad?

Can we assume that this research is presenting an objective truth? How can scientific methods of research really tell us how people are doing? Somehow, I believe that brokenness and pain are hidden in places where no clever psychological method can find them. I believe that events like a divorce have a profound effect on children. Can we really make a ´three-step-plan´ for successful divorces with no harm done to the children?

Can we not go one step back in the whole discussion? May I suggest a rather opposite way of thinking? One that I heard in a sermon by one of the pastors in New Life Church about a year ago… “What your children need to see, is that you give your life for your spouse and that your family is worth everything. Fight the good fight! That way, you open up the way for Jesus´ love to work in and through you.”

Let us discuss how we can support one another to fight the good fight. Let us not tell ourselves that there are no effects to divorce. Let us believe that forgiveness can create a way. Let us keep hope that miracles do happen.

That´s the way I see it.

Hanna Zuring Peterson

The Hells Angels Approach for Church Planting – nightmare or dream scenario?

6

Category : Church, church planting, evangelism, Featured, Jesus Christ, leadership, lifestyle, mission, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

“Swedish biker gangs in expansion fast lane” was the title of an article which spread throughout the whole Swedish Press these last days describing the phenomenon of the multiplication of new divisions among the different criminal motorcycle gangs in Sweden (and in the rest of Europe). (Here, here, here and here).

Attention was given to the rapid growth of the different criminal motorcycle gangs like the Hells Angels, the Bandidos, Outlaws and other up-and-coming gangs. In the last three years five new divisions of the Hells Angels were started in Eskilstuna, Norrköping, Luleå, Uppsala and a new division in Stockholm. Previously, it took them 10 years to start up so many new divisions, so the curve has risen steeply,” said Lasse Wierup, a journalist, author and expert on motorcycle gangs told the TT news agency. (By the way according to Europol, the European Police Organization, there are now more criminal motorcycle gangs in Europe than in the US and Canada)!

Just think of that for a moment: in Sweden there are over 450,000 registered motorcycles, 270,000 of them are registered and on the road. There are approximately 400 known full members of the earlier mentioned criminal clubs and somehow they seem to be so determined and committed that they start all these new divisions in only a few years. Their expansion builds on the one-percenter culture Wierup says.

The other day some of us on staff at EFK (Evangelical Free church in Sweden) were praying, strategizing and discussing how we could plant another 75 churches by the year 2020… these churches will be started in different ways, with different focus and goal groups and in different forms from cell – and house churches, to ethnic churches, city churches and more traditional and/or geographical churches. We discussed how approximately teams of 8 people average could be the nucleus of a new church plant. This means that we need to find 600 people before 2020 that are willing to plant a church. Of course not every one of those is to be a carrier of the vision to plant a church; the large majority can be part of new church plants as team members.

What is my point? The seemingly immense task of planting 75 churches within our EFK context is really not a big task if we consider the commitment and strategy of the Hells Angles clubs. One percent (1%) of the bikers take care of the expansion of the clubs! For us, to fulfill the vision to plant 75 churches by the year 2020 we need to recruit, train and release 600 people (less than 2%) of our members within the EFK context! That’s not a high percentage, add to that the fact that the Lord Jesus Christ commanded ALL His followers to go out into the world and make disciples and we have an easy task at hand!

I would like to suggest a new slogan: “If the Hells Angels can – we can!” – if they can do the things they do based on a mutilate perspective of life build on threats and intimidation and founded on a false concept of brotherhood and belonging. How much more can the Church of Jesus Christ lift herself from the dust, shake of the dust and (finally) start connecting to the Mission of Jesus, going out to create communities of believers where the Lord of lords is worshipped?!

That’s the Way I see it!

John

Life from the fringes – The Spirit of God moves where He wants…

Category : Church, church planting, evangelism, Featured, global, human rights, Jesus Christ, justice, leadership, lifestyle, mission, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Being a student of the history of missions I have always been fascinated by the way God has initiated new spiritual life from the fringes of society, or from the fringes of the well-established and powerful churches and denominations in our world. (See Dagen, the Economist).

The history of the Church is characterized through improbable and impossible enterprises initiated by the Holy Spirit through structures, means and people who were not part of “the powerful, the wise and the rich”. People, almost out from “hiding”, appeared on the stage of the world carrying the Gospel of peace, hope and salvation within vulnerable, breakable and at times seemingly unworthy vessels shaming the ones who thought they had their things together…

UNEXPECTED EXPRESSION OF LIFE

I see what God is doing today in our midst, as I consider the many people from numerous nations who, considered in the eyes of our world, have not been able to impress our rulers and people in power with mighty accomplishments in regard to their involvement (productivity) in our society. But I look at them with different eyes as they serve many unwanted, powerless and voiceless people on the fringes of society bringing them hope, peace and salvation.

While many hope and expect that God will move again from the center, I want to call to your attention that which is already happening on the fringes of society against the odds through an unexpected outburst of life as men and women from many different nations, tribes and tongues make a difference in our secular city and impact our city and its people with hope!

That’s the Way I see it!

John

Our minister of integration Nyamko Sabuni has many view points on religion and religious people in her answer to the Christian Daily Dagen she answered on the question why she seems to criticize religion: “No, I criticize behaviors which violate other people. For me there is a boundary for religion, it is a private matter and how you want to apply it. As soon as your religion starts to influence your neighbor and restrict your neighbors freedom, I want to stop it right there. It is not religion which I criticize, but more how people choose to practice it.”

Of course I don’t want others to be restricted in their freedom, but true faith and a true relationship with Jesus will always affect my neighbor otherwise I am not a disciple at all. I guess that’s where the problem is: Nyamko Sabuni feels it is a private matter and it should be exercised inside with closed doors, the power of the Gospel cannot been contained within the four walls of the Church, it is explosive stuff and has to find its way out!

We’re still on the eve of destruction – Eve 2012

1

Category : Featured, global, human rights, Jesus Christ, justice, leadership, lifestyle, Relationships, sverige, Sweden, The Arts

I have everything, still life is emptyMillions flee the floodingMore rain over city hit by catastropheRussian firesUnited Nations promises help to Pakistan, Haiti is still waitingNew York’s stock exchange plummetingWorld markets slumpChina mudslidesPakistan flood misery growsUzbeks fear genocide -

“Eve of Destruction” is a protest song written by P. F. Sloan in 1965. Several artists have recorded it, but the best-known recording was by Barry McGuire. The recording was made between July 12 and July 15, 1965 and released by Dunhill Records.

In this particular recording Barry McGuire integrates new political and world issues within the context of the old song. Therefore his message is still relevant and as a dart in the heart whether we think of war, environmental issues, politics, power, brokenness and any other subject that is threatening our existence on the face of this earth!

Eve 2012 Lyrics by Barry McGuire

(I am, and I also know that Barry is very greatful, that Delores Berg has written down these lyrics)

The western world, it’s in danger, We the people have become like strangers

Taking polls and opinions, While the fabric decays, for the greed

of the few, how must the innocent pay. And the children are watching, you can

Hear how they pray

And you tell me, Over and over and over again, my friend

You don’t believe, We’re still on the eve

Of destruction

Think of this green Earth, A tropical rainforest

Then take a look around to the Sahara desert, You want it cut it down,

burn it to the ground, leave barren and waste

Till there’s no room for living animals, rivers and lakes

And there’s nothing to stop it but a miracle of faith

And you tell me, Over and over and over again, my friend

You say you don’t believe, We’re still on the eve of destruction

No, you don’t believe that we’re, Still on the eve of destruction

I know you understand, What we’re trying to say

Can’t you see the madness, That’s led up to today

We believe it’s time for a change, For a new golden age

Where the business of life runs in harmony with nature

For nature reflects the beauty within ourselves

And this change in attitude will ring

Out the liberty bells, for the hungry

And the homeless and helpless as well

And you tell me, Over and over and over again my friend

You say you don’t believe we’re still, On the eve of destruction

You don’t believe that we’re still, On the eve of destruction

At the source of silence, whales sing, The song of creation

Transcending the boundaries of, Our souls imagination

You can’t twist the truth, It knows no regulations

‘cause the truth is in love, freedom, And cooperation.

Let there be peace in your heart, That’s alright, that’s where it starts

Let there be peace tonight in, All the nations, for the music

Of life is in our laughter and liberation

And, you tell me, Over and over and over again my friend

You don’t believe that we’re still, on the Eve of Destruction

You don’t believe we’re on the eve of destruction

Barry McGuire

Strategies or myths – views about the church in Sweden / Guest blogger Kjell Axel Johansson

2

Category : Church, church planting, evangelism, Featured, Jesus Christ, lifestyle, mission, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Rethinking some cherished assumptions

Wouldn’t you agree with the idea that we need to be careful not to use Biblical terms that would be confrontational when we present the Gospel to people? Isn’t it far better to answer the questions that people have and then step by step show them what the Christian message really says?  You probably have heard or even used the saying: Jesus is the answer, but now, what was the question? Actually: Do we even need to use words!

Well, there is certainly a merit to this reasoning, if we by confrontational mean using our own, sub-cultural religious language without reflecting on what we really communicate. But there could also be a hidden flaw in this thinking, since we often confuse our own sub-cultural language with the language of the Bible where a world view is presented that is different from all of the contemporary cultures and therefore needs its own language to get the message from God across. Are we tempted to throw out the Bible together with our simplistic sub-culture? We want to appear relevant, but it might also be true, if we are really honest, that we have an internal battle with a fear of appearing a little peculiar. But how do we talk about sin in its Biblical meaning without using the Biblical word for it, or forgiveness, redemption, holiness, heaven or hell and then try to explain what those words/ concepts mean?

There is a logical problem with that since people are seldom interpret non-verbal communication right, but shouldn’t we also be concerned with the fact that the church in Sweden has tried the more careful, conciliatory way of communicating for a long time – and while trying this, the church has slowly dwindled away and is now looked upon as something not very exciting. Our nervous desire to be culturally relevant has made us appear comically irrelevant. And the more we fail to appear relevant, the harder we try to do more of what has not work. Isn’t that absurd? Einstein once said that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the ultimate proof of foolishness.

Throughout the history of the church it was the daring, thinking, risk-taking preachers of the Gospel that changed the world. Read about Jesus’ preaching, then look at Paul, Polycarp, John Chrysostom, John Wesley or Olaus Petri in Sweden. 
It has always been the clear message that has communicated and made the church credible, often in spite of criticism and persecution.

It is the clear, un-adultered message presented in a creative style, that is heard right through the constant message over-load that floods most people’s lives. Some of the strongest contemporary examples combining clarity with creative communication are the Alpha Course, Bill Hybels, Rick Warren, Kerry Shook and in Scandinavia the New Life Church and Hillsong in Stockholm. 


As we continue to plant new churches in greater Stockholm we ask and pray for leaders who have enough integrity to preach the crucified and resurrected Christ, to be creative enough to renew the way they communicate and who fear only one thing: To dishonor the Gospel for which Jesus gave His life.

1 Corinthians 1:18-31

Kjell Axel
 Johansson

Leadership and Truth: Benny Hinn questioned in Sweden and the Word of Life Church after his sermon! (Livets Ord).

20

Category : Church, Featured, global, Jesus Christ, justice, leadership, lifestyle, mission, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Are we looking for ecstatic experiences, super-natural kicks or are we looking for God Himself?  The other day as I wrote about the stepping down of Litorin I wrote a blog about the importance of integrity in leadership. Leadership in general whether Christian or non-Christian, is first of all about integrity, as I today write about Benny Hinn and his leadership I cannot avoid writing about Truth!

Latest last night as an old friend asked me whether I was planning to go and listen (see) Benny Hinn, my response was: “That is the last thing I would do.” I have seen and read too much about Benny Hinn and his lifestyle contrary to what Scripture teaches. And until now I have not even addressed his teachings and praxis.

Lately there has been much discussion about Benny Hinn here in Sweden (here, here, here, here, here, ) because of the invitation of Livets Ord, (The Word of Life Church) led by Ulf Ekman. Different aspects have been addressed in this discussion; the fact that he is in the middle of a divorce- situation with his wife with whom he has been married 22 years without taking a time-out form his ministry. But other voices address his teaching, his showmanship as he ministers, and of course his prosperous, affluent lifestyle where money never seems an issue.

I know there are always controversies over people who are influential, because by nature many of us are jealous, competitive and arrogant and cannot accept that someone is better or more-liked than we are.

But in the midst of this process we have some new, hard facts about Benny’s teachings, which made even his friend Ulf Ekman, react clearly.  What I like about Ulf is his willingness to confront Benny about these things, what I don’t like is that he didn’t do it publicly at the meeting after Benny’s sermon as he only told the conference participants to go home and check what they heard with their Bibles.


The other day I found out that news articles (rumours?) would be released (Aug 2) about a special romantic relationship of Benny Hinn with Paula White, another television preacher, in the National Enquirer a gossip magazine in the US although, at that moment, the Swedish bloggers and press had not caught up on the story, I decided to not write about it as the information and the trustworthiness of the magazine could be questioned. Both Benny and Paula White have written on their websites to denounce this relationship. It is clearly from reading their responses that they have synchronized their views and stories as they almost use similar wording in their statements.

Anyway, now Ulf Ekman is questioning Benny in an in-depth blog that he wrote today. I will freely translate some of Ulf’s perspectives that are important for this subject.

After a long introduction writing how Benny’s ministry has touched the lives of so many people and Ulf’s experiences of this in many conferences he says:

Having said all of this, I must say that in all the meetings where I have been with him, I have never before heard what he said and taught here (Uppsala, Sweden) yesterday. His teachings, and he is not alone in those, seem to be more developed and worked through by him more than by any other person, went way beyond that which I believe to be classical Christian faith and healthy teaching. It had not only Gnostic influences; it had unfortunately intersections with pure Gnosticism.

On Saturday night it started off well as Benny spoke about the Holy Spirit as a person, not only as a power. But soon the address moved away from the focus and became speculative as he addressed pre-adamitical races and an earlier fall into sin. It became more complicated as he moved from the Trinity to the “human trinity”. Our bodies are not only an outer shell, like a glove that we throw off, but it is an essential and integrated part of our identity and personality. We should not devaluate the importance of the body. We are not a spirit in contrast to our body. We are a spirit, a soul and body, or spirit and flesh, and human’s so-called “trinity” keeps together as a unit, our personality. And we cannot separate this in different isolated compartments. Therefore the resurrection of the body is so important since it is as important as the soul, which Benny mentioned, but only in passing by.

When he finally arrived to Jesus in his sermon he addressed in certain parts a heretic picture of Jesus. The Son was not an eternal Son, the Father was not an eternal Father and it sounded as if there had been a time when the Son didn’t exist. I asked him this right after this meeting and then he denied that and said that he meant that the Son was eternal as Word and first was called “Son” as he came to the earth.

It became more remarkable as he speculated about the fact “that if Jesus had sinned his body would not have been subjected unto decay.” This is important to reprove, because if true, Jesus body was no real body, which leaves us with an incomplete, docetic, and ostensible incarnation. Docetism and the heretic Marcion teaches that the body of Jesus was only an illusion. It was seemingly real, but still not since God will not engage and mix with matter, which is evil. The Christian faith says that the body of Jesus was fully human. If He was not fully human, he could not identify with us ad could not become our replacement and thus we could not be saved.

Later on he shared that Jesus’ blood didn’t come from Mary but directly from God. That’s not true. In Mary and through Mary Jesus humanity was developed and that includes all the parts of his physical body, also his blood. The blood is a part of his physical body and his true human identity…

…It would have been better for Benny to have left out his deep “insights” without making things too difficult for him beyond his capacity and instead have spoken about Jesus in a powerful way which he is able to do and often has done and as an evangelist should do. That would have been enough for us and it is important to fully present the Biblical Jesus.

It seems as if the whole matter becomes a settlement with different Gnostic influences within the Christian faith, but I didn’t believe that we would hear that from Benny Hinn on this particular evening. It was an unpleasant surprise that it came so strongly and so much of it. The fact is that it came and it has therefore to be reproved. In the end it is about salvation, where a illusive, docetic Jesus can not save, which leads to myths and speculations…

Ulf is happy to be Benny’s friend and has confronted him with all the issues addressed above. Now the question is: “will he stand corrected”? Will Benny show his willingness to be interdependent within the Body of Christ and with brothers and sisters (who all sin and who all need forgiveness and correction) and to bow under the Lordship of Jesus as Head?

Or will Benny see this as an occasion where a person “touches the Lord’s anointed” and put a curse on him?

I don’t know what the outcome will be, I hope that he will be able to allow others to speak into his life, not only in this matter but in so many other areas as well so that his life will become a reflection of His Lord:

Phil 2: 3 -8 Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit, but in humility consider others better than yourselves. 4Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others. 5Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus: 6Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, 7but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness. 8And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death— even death on a cross!

Time will tell!

That’s the Way I see it!

John


Love it or hate it – leadership is a matter of integrity, you can’t hide!

Category : Featured, global, justice, leadership, lifestyle, Political Correctness, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Today’s news about the possible buying of sexual favors of Sven Otto Littorin, who left his position as Minister of the Labor Market of the Swedish coalition government this last Wednesday July 7th opens up many questions about people in public leadership. (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here). The consequences and the price of public leadership are often underestimated; it is actually an open invitation to scrutiny, exposure and accountability. For the ignorant leader, establishment in the limelight can be attractive and honoring, but the fact is that few realize the overwhelming untamed, destructive powers that are released as one embraces her/his position there.

Leadership is not first of all influence, it is responsibility and few realize the prize of leadership. Therefore many leaders and leadership consultants emphasize the importance of character and integrity. Peter Drucker one of the persons who have influenced the perspective on leadership the most during the last century said: “The only definition of a leader is someone who has followers.” To gain followers requires influence but doesn’t exclude the lack of integrity in achieving this. Indeed, it can be argued that several of the world’s greatest leaders have lacked integrity and have adopted values that would not be shared by many people today.

Another leader John C Maxwell says: “Leadership is influence – nothing more, nothing less.” This moves beyond the position defining the leader, to looking at the ability of the leader to influence others – both those who would consider themselves followers, and those outside that circle. Indirectly, it also builds in leadership character, since without maintaining integrity and trustworthiness, the capability to influence will disappear.

I have no clue what Littorin has or hasn’t done, I know each one of us is one step (one decision) away from doing stupid things that have a lasting influence on our lives and the lives of others, I do know that we have to walk the talk and live in transparency, openness and accountability to be able to exercise true leadership. But whether we are leaders or not, isn’t that expected from all of us?

That’s the Way I see it!

John

Politically Correct, Lies or Tolerance? You lost me there!

Category : Church, Featured, human rights, Jesus Christ, justice, leadership, lifestyle, muslim, Political Correctness, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Today Ungdomsstyrelsen, the Swedish National Board for Youth Affairs, which deals with youth associations, and general youth policies declares that they have come to the conclusion that they have found no discrimination in the organizations which were under their scrutiny. The press release says: “In the information that we have gone through we find nothing which suggests that these organizations discriminate people based on their sexual orientation. Homosexuals can be members on the same conditions as others and they can have commissions of trust and employment within the organizations”.

(“I de underlag som vi har gått igenom finns inget som visar att organisationerna diskriminerar individer på grund av sexuell läggning. Homosexuella kan vara medlemmar på samma villkor som andra och de kan ha förtroendeuppdrag och anställningar i organisationerna.”)

Four Christian and one Muslim organization were under this scrutiny; they were Pingst Ung (Young Pentecostals) Sweden’s young Muslims, The Young Catholics, EFK Young and The Youth initiative in the Syrian Orthodox Church.

I have written about these issues in some of my earlier blogs:

Will we be sideline, will we play along or will we play our own game?

The Intolerance of the virtue of tolerance…

I am 100% convinced that there is no discrimination against the sexual orientations of people in at least some of these movements; however, I am amazed about the conclusion that everyone is under the same conditions in regards to commissions of trust and employment within these organizations. I don’t believe that this is true!  I haven’t been at the conversations with the representatives of these movements but I cannot believe that this is factual. Lifestyle issues are at the core of beliefs and convictions of these movements. Would the Swedish young Muslims employ someone of the mentioned group as a full time representative for them?


I am not sure what is cooking under the surface; maybe Ungdomsstyrelsen was not prepared to take the consequences of this hot potato yet. Maybe the representatives of the movements had cold feet and didn’t want to speak in clear terms. Maybe we are all lied to.

I don’t know what the issue is, but I am 100% convinced that it is only a matter of time before it will (again) become a political issue – or should I say a “politically correct issue”. Time will tell!

For me the main question is still “Will we be sideline, will we play along or will we play our own game?” We better prepare and decide because we cannot adjust to the different ways the political winds blow!

That’s the Way I see it!

John


“Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s: the Swedish Church”

1

Category : Church, leadership, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Maud Olofsson, leader of the Centre party which is part of the governing coalition says in an interview with the Christian Daily “Dagen”, about her perspective on the Swedish Church, that “ don’t want to church to be led by priests” (“Vi vill inte att kyrkan ska ledas av präster”)…

In an earlier blog I wrote: Svenska Kyrkan – The Swedish Church – Politics as usual! Please: R.I.P! I think it is about time to truly separate the Swedish Church from politics and to give to Caesar what is Caesar’s! So many of the discussions around the wedding of the Crown Princess Victoria were born out of this same problem.

Isn’t it time to let go of The Swedish Church as an extension of live in this “kingdom of Sweden” and not to be led by sentimental reasoning (the church of the people – which church, which people?) and political power systems, forcing their political agenda’s down our throats?

That’s the Way I see it!

John

Biblical reference in Daniel’s speech to Crown Princess Victoria – what did he really mean?

Category : Featured, Jesus Christ, lifestyle, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Daniel quoted part of the last verse of 1 Corinthians 13: 13 as he said: “Victoria, greatest of all is love. I love you dearly” (Victoria, störst av allt är kärleken. Jag älskar dig så, sade prins Daniel). (Here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here).

1 Corinthians 13:13 And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.


As a pastor of a church with many young people I have the privilege to conduct the wedding ceremony for dozens of couples during the last 17 years. Many of couples wanted to read 1 Corinthians 13, the scripture of which Daniel quoted.

The first time I ever read this particular scripture was when a young girl (who is now my wife) shortly after our conversion to Jesus Christ wrote down the whole text of this chapter in a personal letter to me without telling me it was a quote from the Bible. Since I had not read the whole Bible at the time, I was blown away with what I perceived as being this profound wisdom of love in my girlfriend’s poem (that’s what I thought it was)! It was a beautiful and deep statement of love.

It was years later that I started to understand what it was all about. It is not a coincidence that chapter 13 in the letter to the Corinthians is found between chapters 12 & 14 which speak about the spiritual gifts and the use thereof. Here in the middle of the supernatural spiritual gifts, the apostle Paul stops and refocuses on that what is to carry these gifts in one’s life; namely “LOVE” – (Agape, as the original Greek word says).

I am not doubting Daniel’s love for Victoria, neither do I doubt the love which led so many other young couples decide to use this text as Bible reading in their wedding ceremonies. However, I do wonder whether they understand what this is all about.  The press (including the Christian press) is writing almost sentimentally about this fact, the choice of words and the quotation from the Bible.

The essence of agape love as found in 1 Corinthians 13 is self-sacrifice. Unlike our English word “love,” agape is not used in the Bible to refer to romantic or sexual love. Nor does it refer to close friendship or brotherly love, for which the Greek word philia is used. Nor does agape mean charity, a term which the King James translators carried over from the Latin. Agape love is unique and is distinguished by its nature and character. Agape is love, which is of and from God, whose very nature is love itself.

“Divine gift love in a man enables him to love what is not naturally lovable — lepers, criminals, enemies, morons, the sulky, the superior, and the sneering.”

You might think I am picky to question the use of such a Scripture, but I believe there is already too much devaluation in the use and meaning of the Bible and even of the word “love”; I love ice-cream, I love that t-shirt, I would love to see him fail, tonight we will make (fake) love… and you will know another dozen of applications of that same word.

C. S. Lewis the famous British author wrote a book on the “four loves” where he explained the different words describing love in Biblical (New Testament) times. One favorite quotation I want to share from that book: “To love at all is to be vulnerable. Love anything and your heart will be wrung and possibly broken. If you want to make sure of keeping it intact you must give it to no one, not even an animal. Wrap it carefully round with hobbies and little luxuries; avoid all entanglements. Lock it up safe in the casket or coffin of your selfishness. But in that casket, safe, dark, motionless, airless, it will change. It will not be broken; it will become unbreakable, impenetrable, and irredeemable. To love is to be vulnerable.” C.S. Lewis (The Four Loves)

I wish Victoria and Daniel as a new couple much Agape love which will not only touch and transform their own lives but also the lives of everyone they come in contact with!

That’s the Way I see it!

John

Below a short summary of Lewis’ explanation of the different loves…

  1. Affection (storge, στοργή) is fondness through familiarity, especially between family members or people who have otherwise found themselves together by chance. It is described as the most natural, emotive, and widely diffused of loves: natural in that it is present without coercion; emotive because it is the result of fondness due to familiarity; and most widely diffused because it pays the least attention to those characteristics deemed “valuable” or worthy of love and, as a result, is able to transcend most discriminating factors. Ironically, its strength is also what makes it vulnerable. Affection has the appearance of being “built-in” or “ready made”, says Lewis, and as a result people come to expect, even to demand, its presence—irrespective of their behavior and its natural consequences.
  2. Philia – Friendship is a strong bond existing between people who share a common interest or activity. Lewis explicitly says that his definition of friendship is narrower than mere companionship.
  3. Eros (ἔρως) is love in the sense of ‘being in love’. This is distinct from sexuality, which Lewis calls Venus, although he does spend time discussing sexual activity and its spiritual significance in both a pagan and a Christian sense. He identifies eros as indifferent.
  4. Agape  (agapē, ἀγάπη) is the love that brings forth caring regardless of circumstance. Lewis recognizes this as the greatest of loves, and sees it as a specifically Christian virtue. The chapter on the subject focuses on the need of subordinating the natural loves to the love of God, who is full of charitable love.