Featured Posts

Half Way through the Tour - Check out great music from... Friends! We are overwhelmed by the response of people on the Harvest Field Tour… (search on Facebook for more information). To speak about the spiritual situation in Sweden and to awaken awareness about it is one of the major objectives of the tour… Our desire is to build partnerships with individuals, churches and organizations to further the cause of church planting...

Read more

Steve Anderson from converge world wide our wonderful... Download now or watch on posterous IMG_0133.MOV (5253 KB) Skickat från min iPhone

Read more

THE HARVEST FIELD TOUR - arrived in Minneapolis and... We have had some major problems with our telephones and internet connection with the homepage therefore we have not been able to put in yet another film in our blog... Here some glimpses of our trip. Yesterday a greta meeting with 800+ students and faculty in Bethel. God spoke to a number of people and we pray and hope that some of them will be used by God to make a...

Read more

Why I don’t (yet) believe in the restoration of Ted... I have been following the Haggard story from the very beginning of his ministry and I really appreciated his book “The life giving church” – I still like the book. Truth is truth no matter who speaks it out, independent of their circumstances. I posted articles on my former blog and wrote about Ted and the scandal that was unfolding as he was "caught" in contact...

Read more

Now regular updates on church planting, stockholm,... Follow us (and me) on this blog and follow our trip throughout USA by subscribing to this blog! Download now or watch on posterous IMG_0086.MOV (4507 KB) Skickat från min iPhone

Read more

Grace: forgive and forget!

3

Category : Church, Featured, Jesus Christ, lifestyle, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Oftentimes I really don’t understand this concept of grace. I want to earn my way through; I don’t want short cuts in my life. I have learned to be self-sufficient. From early age on I have learned to survive, learned to deal with obstacles, problems, and challenges.

One of the challenges after having become a Christian is to receive. Receive forgiveness, receive love, receive grace, and receive life. I, as the older son in the story of the Prodigal son have behaved, as I should. And to be honest, in many ways I have been more lost than my younger brother, although I have remained at home for many years!

People like me need to be reminded of our true inner-state, time after time again. Our inner being reeks of self-righteousness, self-sufficiency and self-deception.  Then suddenly a ray of light enters my darkened conscious and I realize the depth of Jesus’ love to me:

“You will trample our sins under your feet and throw them into the depths of the ocean!” (Micah 7:19b NLT).

“For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more”. (Jeremiah 31:34)

We must never forget that Christ did not only suffer during His three years of public ministry or the last few days of His life when He was crucified. He suffered throughout His life on earth. He who was without sin lived daily with the corruption and sinfulness of me… and you.

When that hits home, grace is understood better!

That’s the Way I see it!
John

Anne Rice quits Christianity but for former atheist Holly Ordway Christ and Church make sense!

2

Category : Church, evangelism, Featured, global, Jesus Christ, Relationships

We have heard a lot about Anne Rice the former Vampire author who had returned to her Catholic roots and who recently said: “following Christ does not mean following His followers.” I agree with that statement but the fact is that Jesus’ followers are brought together into His Body, the Church. In that fellowship of broken, abused, disoriented and sin-ridden people Christ Himself decided to bring healing, hope, perspective and redemption.

Anne Rice is facing , according to the different articles and interviews which I have read about her, many issues where her own perspective and that of other followers of Christ go separate ways, add to that the insensitive approach that many employ, no wonder she can’t deal with God’s personnel down her on earth!

Having said that I was so touched to read the story of Holly Ordway who was a highly educated atheist who thought Christianity was “a historical curiosity” or “a blemish on modern civilization,” or both.

“Smart people don’t become Christians,” she thought, according to Biola University. Her worldview, however, began to change at age 31. She recounts her journey from atheism to Christianity in the recently released Not God’s Type: A Rational Academic Finds a Radical Faith”.

“It is no light matter to meet God after having denied Him all one’s life,” she writes in the book. “Coming to Him was only the beginning. I can point to a day and time and place of my conversion, and yet since then I have come to understand that He calls me to a fresh conversion every day.”

Ordway, a professor of English and literature at a San Diego-area community college, wasn’t raised in any religious faith. She never said a prayer in her life and she never went to a church service.

How refreshing is her approach as she considers her experiences in the church and writes on the importance of the church family: “I got to thinking: where else do we get this kind of example? Where else do we see teenagers, adults, and the elderly all together for the same reason? Where else do we see single people and married couples, those with wiggly toddlers, with grown-up children, and those without children, all spending time together? People who are part of a large extended family – and who live in the same area as that family – get this experience as a natural part of their life, but I suspect that’s increasingly rare these days”.

A refreshing wind of commitment to Christ and a realistic view on what Church is all about!

That’s the Way I see it!

John

Obey your leaders and submit to them – and don’t believe everything they say!:)?

2

Category : Church, Featured, Jesus Christ, leadership, lifestyle, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king!

In our time (and throughout the history of the Christian Church) there have been abusive and manipulative leaders trying to seduce the believers in the church. Jesus Himself warned for them, Paul wrote that they would rise from among the leaders in the church. I support the approach in the article from Jonas Melin in the daily Christian paper to 100% at the same time I would like to raise a flag.

The main Christian news during the “summer news drought” in Sweden has been the heretic teachings of Bennie Hinn, his divorce process and possible relationship to Paula White, which he stopped. With that as backdrop I understand the need for Jonas’ teachings as we time after time discover the lack of knowledge and discernment among believers as they run after teachers who give them what they want (and not what they need).

Jonas uses the teachings of Paul as guidelines for evaluating whether or not a teaching/sermon/preaching/dogma is from God or not. In different blogs, I have addressed exactly the same issues as Jonas in regards to teaching, the life and lifestyle of the leader and her/his character. (Don’t forget that almost all requirements for elders and deacons in the church according to Timothy and Titus are character issues – not spiritual gifts!)

The problem we face is that many people in our churches today are Biblically illiterate; they don’t have the Biblical knowledge (nor input which helps them to get it) and therefore they don’t have a sound Biblical foundation by which to evaluate teachings and people’s seductive approaches (seduction implies that things are done in a non-obvious way and therefore requires a healthy basis and discernment).

Another aspect is the we are spiritually, emotionally and socially starving; the lack of intimacy, real and meaningful relationships in the Church and the absence of God’s supernatural intervention in our society and life as Church make us very vulnerable and willing to embrace situations, contexts and leaders where things seem to happen, which at other times would not be considered interesting.

Lastly, a short observation… we live in a country where people from the day they were born have been encouraged to question everyone and everything. (Strangely enough this is not always practiced as we have seen earlier on). However, there is a deep resentment and suspicion of leadership in general. We almost exalt questioning of people in authority as a virtue within our culture. That’s why so many Christian leaders in our nations stop being leaders! It is just too hard to be a God-loving, God-fearing and God-obeying leader as people don’t show respect, reference and submission to those who are put in leadership (yes, I realize some have TAKEN this leadership position – it is not always God-given).

Hebrews 13: 15 Through Jesus, therefore, let us continually offer to God a sacrifice of praise—the fruit of lips that confess his name. 16And do not forget to do good and to share with others, for with such sacrifices God is pleased. 17Obey your leaders and submit to their authority. They keep watch over you as men who must give an account. Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no advantage to you.

Here we find a healthy challenge; we are to test (not to question!) everything and at the same time we are called to have a reference and respect for those whom God has put as leaders among us. My approach to this is that I will always start with TRUST – not questioning. What is your approach?

This is the Way I see it!

John

Strategies or myths – views about the church in Sweden / Guest blogger Kjell Axel Johansson

2

Category : Church, church planting, evangelism, Featured, Jesus Christ, lifestyle, mission, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Rethinking some cherished assumptions

Wouldn’t you agree with the idea that we need to be careful not to use Biblical terms that would be confrontational when we present the Gospel to people? Isn’t it far better to answer the questions that people have and then step by step show them what the Christian message really says?  You probably have heard or even used the saying: Jesus is the answer, but now, what was the question? Actually: Do we even need to use words!

Well, there is certainly a merit to this reasoning, if we by confrontational mean using our own, sub-cultural religious language without reflecting on what we really communicate. But there could also be a hidden flaw in this thinking, since we often confuse our own sub-cultural language with the language of the Bible where a world view is presented that is different from all of the contemporary cultures and therefore needs its own language to get the message from God across. Are we tempted to throw out the Bible together with our simplistic sub-culture? We want to appear relevant, but it might also be true, if we are really honest, that we have an internal battle with a fear of appearing a little peculiar. But how do we talk about sin in its Biblical meaning without using the Biblical word for it, or forgiveness, redemption, holiness, heaven or hell and then try to explain what those words/ concepts mean?

There is a logical problem with that since people are seldom interpret non-verbal communication right, but shouldn’t we also be concerned with the fact that the church in Sweden has tried the more careful, conciliatory way of communicating for a long time – and while trying this, the church has slowly dwindled away and is now looked upon as something not very exciting. Our nervous desire to be culturally relevant has made us appear comically irrelevant. And the more we fail to appear relevant, the harder we try to do more of what has not work. Isn’t that absurd? Einstein once said that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the ultimate proof of foolishness.

Throughout the history of the church it was the daring, thinking, risk-taking preachers of the Gospel that changed the world. Read about Jesus’ preaching, then look at Paul, Polycarp, John Chrysostom, John Wesley or Olaus Petri in Sweden. 
It has always been the clear message that has communicated and made the church credible, often in spite of criticism and persecution.

It is the clear, un-adultered message presented in a creative style, that is heard right through the constant message over-load that floods most people’s lives. Some of the strongest contemporary examples combining clarity with creative communication are the Alpha Course, Bill Hybels, Rick Warren, Kerry Shook and in Scandinavia the New Life Church and Hillsong in Stockholm. 


As we continue to plant new churches in greater Stockholm we ask and pray for leaders who have enough integrity to preach the crucified and resurrected Christ, to be creative enough to renew the way they communicate and who fear only one thing: To dishonor the Gospel for which Jesus gave His life.

1 Corinthians 1:18-31

Kjell Axel
 Johansson

Leadership and Truth: Benny Hinn questioned in Sweden and the Word of Life Church after his sermon! (Livets Ord).

20

Category : Church, Featured, global, Jesus Christ, justice, leadership, lifestyle, mission, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Are we looking for ecstatic experiences, super-natural kicks or are we looking for God Himself?  The other day as I wrote about the stepping down of Litorin I wrote a blog about the importance of integrity in leadership. Leadership in general whether Christian or non-Christian, is first of all about integrity, as I today write about Benny Hinn and his leadership I cannot avoid writing about Truth!

Latest last night as an old friend asked me whether I was planning to go and listen (see) Benny Hinn, my response was: “That is the last thing I would do.” I have seen and read too much about Benny Hinn and his lifestyle contrary to what Scripture teaches. And until now I have not even addressed his teachings and praxis.

Lately there has been much discussion about Benny Hinn here in Sweden (here, here, here, here, here, ) because of the invitation of Livets Ord, (The Word of Life Church) led by Ulf Ekman. Different aspects have been addressed in this discussion; the fact that he is in the middle of a divorce- situation with his wife with whom he has been married 22 years without taking a time-out form his ministry. But other voices address his teaching, his showmanship as he ministers, and of course his prosperous, affluent lifestyle where money never seems an issue.

I know there are always controversies over people who are influential, because by nature many of us are jealous, competitive and arrogant and cannot accept that someone is better or more-liked than we are.

But in the midst of this process we have some new, hard facts about Benny’s teachings, which made even his friend Ulf Ekman, react clearly.  What I like about Ulf is his willingness to confront Benny about these things, what I don’t like is that he didn’t do it publicly at the meeting after Benny’s sermon as he only told the conference participants to go home and check what they heard with their Bibles.


The other day I found out that news articles (rumours?) would be released (Aug 2) about a special romantic relationship of Benny Hinn with Paula White, another television preacher, in the National Enquirer a gossip magazine in the US although, at that moment, the Swedish bloggers and press had not caught up on the story, I decided to not write about it as the information and the trustworthiness of the magazine could be questioned. Both Benny and Paula White have written on their websites to denounce this relationship. It is clearly from reading their responses that they have synchronized their views and stories as they almost use similar wording in their statements.

Anyway, now Ulf Ekman is questioning Benny in an in-depth blog that he wrote today. I will freely translate some of Ulf’s perspectives that are important for this subject.

After a long introduction writing how Benny’s ministry has touched the lives of so many people and Ulf’s experiences of this in many conferences he says:

Having said all of this, I must say that in all the meetings where I have been with him, I have never before heard what he said and taught here (Uppsala, Sweden) yesterday. His teachings, and he is not alone in those, seem to be more developed and worked through by him more than by any other person, went way beyond that which I believe to be classical Christian faith and healthy teaching. It had not only Gnostic influences; it had unfortunately intersections with pure Gnosticism.

On Saturday night it started off well as Benny spoke about the Holy Spirit as a person, not only as a power. But soon the address moved away from the focus and became speculative as he addressed pre-adamitical races and an earlier fall into sin. It became more complicated as he moved from the Trinity to the “human trinity”. Our bodies are not only an outer shell, like a glove that we throw off, but it is an essential and integrated part of our identity and personality. We should not devaluate the importance of the body. We are not a spirit in contrast to our body. We are a spirit, a soul and body, or spirit and flesh, and human’s so-called “trinity” keeps together as a unit, our personality. And we cannot separate this in different isolated compartments. Therefore the resurrection of the body is so important since it is as important as the soul, which Benny mentioned, but only in passing by.

When he finally arrived to Jesus in his sermon he addressed in certain parts a heretic picture of Jesus. The Son was not an eternal Son, the Father was not an eternal Father and it sounded as if there had been a time when the Son didn’t exist. I asked him this right after this meeting and then he denied that and said that he meant that the Son was eternal as Word and first was called “Son” as he came to the earth.

It became more remarkable as he speculated about the fact “that if Jesus had sinned his body would not have been subjected unto decay.” This is important to reprove, because if true, Jesus body was no real body, which leaves us with an incomplete, docetic, and ostensible incarnation. Docetism and the heretic Marcion teaches that the body of Jesus was only an illusion. It was seemingly real, but still not since God will not engage and mix with matter, which is evil. The Christian faith says that the body of Jesus was fully human. If He was not fully human, he could not identify with us ad could not become our replacement and thus we could not be saved.

Later on he shared that Jesus’ blood didn’t come from Mary but directly from God. That’s not true. In Mary and through Mary Jesus humanity was developed and that includes all the parts of his physical body, also his blood. The blood is a part of his physical body and his true human identity…

…It would have been better for Benny to have left out his deep “insights” without making things too difficult for him beyond his capacity and instead have spoken about Jesus in a powerful way which he is able to do and often has done and as an evangelist should do. That would have been enough for us and it is important to fully present the Biblical Jesus.

It seems as if the whole matter becomes a settlement with different Gnostic influences within the Christian faith, but I didn’t believe that we would hear that from Benny Hinn on this particular evening. It was an unpleasant surprise that it came so strongly and so much of it. The fact is that it came and it has therefore to be reproved. In the end it is about salvation, where a illusive, docetic Jesus can not save, which leads to myths and speculations…

Ulf is happy to be Benny’s friend and has confronted him with all the issues addressed above. Now the question is: “will he stand corrected”? Will Benny show his willingness to be interdependent within the Body of Christ and with brothers and sisters (who all sin and who all need forgiveness and correction) and to bow under the Lordship of Jesus as Head?

Or will Benny see this as an occasion where a person “touches the Lord’s anointed” and put a curse on him?

I don’t know what the outcome will be, I hope that he will be able to allow others to speak into his life, not only in this matter but in so many other areas as well so that his life will become a reflection of His Lord:

Phil 2: 3 -8 Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit, but in humility consider others better than yourselves. 4Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others. 5Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus: 6Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, 7but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness. 8And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death— even death on a cross!

Time will tell!

That’s the Way I see it!

John


Politically Correct, Lies or Tolerance? You lost me there!

Category : Church, Featured, human rights, Jesus Christ, justice, leadership, lifestyle, muslim, Political Correctness, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Today Ungdomsstyrelsen, the Swedish National Board for Youth Affairs, which deals with youth associations, and general youth policies declares that they have come to the conclusion that they have found no discrimination in the organizations which were under their scrutiny. The press release says: “In the information that we have gone through we find nothing which suggests that these organizations discriminate people based on their sexual orientation. Homosexuals can be members on the same conditions as others and they can have commissions of trust and employment within the organizations”.

(“I de underlag som vi har gått igenom finns inget som visar att organisationerna diskriminerar individer på grund av sexuell läggning. Homosexuella kan vara medlemmar på samma villkor som andra och de kan ha förtroendeuppdrag och anställningar i organisationerna.”)

Four Christian and one Muslim organization were under this scrutiny; they were Pingst Ung (Young Pentecostals) Sweden’s young Muslims, The Young Catholics, EFK Young and The Youth initiative in the Syrian Orthodox Church.

I have written about these issues in some of my earlier blogs:

Will we be sideline, will we play along or will we play our own game?

The Intolerance of the virtue of tolerance…

I am 100% convinced that there is no discrimination against the sexual orientations of people in at least some of these movements; however, I am amazed about the conclusion that everyone is under the same conditions in regards to commissions of trust and employment within these organizations. I don’t believe that this is true!  I haven’t been at the conversations with the representatives of these movements but I cannot believe that this is factual. Lifestyle issues are at the core of beliefs and convictions of these movements. Would the Swedish young Muslims employ someone of the mentioned group as a full time representative for them?


I am not sure what is cooking under the surface; maybe Ungdomsstyrelsen was not prepared to take the consequences of this hot potato yet. Maybe the representatives of the movements had cold feet and didn’t want to speak in clear terms. Maybe we are all lied to.

I don’t know what the issue is, but I am 100% convinced that it is only a matter of time before it will (again) become a political issue – or should I say a “politically correct issue”. Time will tell!

For me the main question is still “Will we be sideline, will we play along or will we play our own game?” We better prepare and decide because we cannot adjust to the different ways the political winds blow!

That’s the Way I see it!

John


En politisk handling att saga “nej” till Gud – A political action by saying “No” to God.

Category : Church, global, Jesus Christ, leadership, lifestyle, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Eva Dahlgren one of Sweden’s most know and loved artists has a problem with a God who has opinions about people and the way they live (this includes their sexuality). Some time ago I met with a secular book publisher as we were traveling together from Gothenburg’s book fair.  He called himself an atheist and told me that it was hard for him to believe in the kind of Christianity in Sweden because, and here I quote, “a church where everything is possible cannot believe in anything!”

This statement reminded me of Stanley Hauwerwas who said: “Christians, to be more specific, do not believe that we have a right to do with our bodies whatever we want. We do not believe that we have a right to our bodies because when we are baptized we become members of one another; then we can tell one another what it is that we should, and should not, do with our bodies. I had a colleague at the University of Notre Dame. He was Jewish and always said that any religion that does not tell you what to do with your genitals and pots and pans cannot be interesting. That is exactly true. In the Church we tell you what you can and cannot do with your genitals. They are not your own. They are not private. That means that you cannot commit adultery. If you do, you are no longer a member of ”us”. Of course pots and pans are equally important.”

Stanley Hauerwas: “Kristna, för att vara lite mer specifik, tror inte oss ha rätt att göra vad vi vill med våra kroppar. Vi tror inte att vi har rätt till våra kroppar eftersom vi, när vi blivit döpta, blir en del av varandra; sedan kan vi tala om för varandra vad vi borde, och inte borde, göra med våra kroppar. Jag hade en kollega som undervisade vid University of Notre Dame. Han var jude och sa alltid att religioner som inte talar om för dig vad du ska göra med dina könsorgan, pengar och prylar, de kan inte vara intressanta. Det är helt sant. I församlingen talar vi om för dig vad du kan och inte kan göra med dina könsorgan. De är inte dina egna. De är inte privata. Det innebär att du inte kan begå äktenskapsbrott. Om du gör det, är du inte längre en del av ”oss”.  Naturligtvis är pengar och prylar lika viktiga.”

Stanley Hauerwas (born July 24, 1940) is a Christian theologian and ethicist, find his blog here. He has taught at the University of Notre Dame and is currently the Gilbert T. Rowe Professor of Theological Ethics at Duke Divinity School with a joint appointment at the Duke University School of Law. Time magazine in 2001 named him “America’s Best Theologian”. He responded by saying, “‘Best’ is not a theological category.”

I like the Way he sees it!

John

“Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s: the Swedish Church”

1

Category : Church, leadership, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

Maud Olofsson, leader of the Centre party which is part of the governing coalition says in an interview with the Christian Daily “Dagen”, about her perspective on the Swedish Church, that “ don’t want to church to be led by priests” (“Vi vill inte att kyrkan ska ledas av präster”)…

In an earlier blog I wrote: Svenska Kyrkan – The Swedish Church – Politics as usual! Please: R.I.P! I think it is about time to truly separate the Swedish Church from politics and to give to Caesar what is Caesar’s! So many of the discussions around the wedding of the Crown Princess Victoria were born out of this same problem.

Isn’t it time to let go of The Swedish Church as an extension of live in this “kingdom of Sweden” and not to be led by sentimental reasoning (the church of the people – which church, which people?) and political power systems, forcing their political agenda’s down our throats?

That’s the Way I see it!

John

Imagine a church where…

Category : Church, church planting, Featured, Jesus Christ, leadership, lifestyle, mission, Relationships, sverige, Sweden

So many voices, (here, here, here, here and here) so many thoughts, so much longing, so much despair…

Imagine a church where we identify with Jesus and his mission (Missio Dei), where we try to “impact our world with hope” , where we have a true community of faith and where we welcome strangers among us. A church where the illegal, the homeless, the broken, the highly educated, the illiterate, the Swede, new Swede and non-Swede find a home and a haven.

Imagine a church where you can’t leave your handbag, your telephone or your wallet at your table or chair when you go forward for prayer after a Biblical message because they might be stolen as you get back to your chair after an encounter with God.

Imagine a church where people open their homes for friends and foes, where they invite you to join a good meal or where you can stay because you have no housing.

Imagine a church building where (almost) day and night people come just to meet, to share their lives together, to bring new friends, or other people who have fallen through the cracks of our social system.

Imagine that church building filled up with group after group, small groups, big groups, meeting there because many of the ones who come to that church have just a room to live in, or share their small apartments with others. They use that church building as a home.

Churches like that actually exist in Sweden! Our church, New Life Church in Stockholm is one of them. In the eyes of the non-discerning observer, we might look like any other traditional church.

What is a traditional church after all? Does being a traditional church mean having a church building, employing staff, preaching 30-minute sermons, defining membership, the vision and mission of the church, or having a budget?

Today there is a strong reaction against such things as if they would hinder an authentic, relevant, missional, effective and trust-worthy expression of the church! I think it is rubbish!

I am SICK of people; theorists and theologizing idealists who always have opinions and viewpoints about “the traditional church” or that which reeks traditional, whatever that is!

  • For me church is no church if it isn’t deeply rooted in the reality of the society it is part of.
  • Church is no church if it is not a community that is called out from the world, and yet established in the middle of that same world to make a difference.
  • Church is no church when LOVE doesn’t cost you everything!
  • Church is the community of the believers whether they meet in squatters, in cathedrals, huge centers, in homes or schools, honestly I don’t care where they meet, how big buildings they have, whether they have paid staff or voluntary staff… as long as they do the mission which Jesus gave them to do!

I get tired of so many people theorizing about what church COULD be instead of BEING church. I appeal to you to not create contrasts and camps where they don’t exist. There is NOT ONE WAY of being church; all different expressions are needed as we build communities of the King!

I leave you with a quote from C.T. Studd one of the famous historical missionary pioneers who said: “DO IT!”

That’s the Way I see it!

John

Mitt förslag: skatteavdrag för gåvor och volontärinsatser! – My proposal tax deduction for financial gifts and volunteer work…

1

Category : Church, Featured, lifestyle, sverige, Sweden

Different political parties are on a crusade in regards to making financial contributions to charities tax-deductible. (Here, Here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here). In contrast to the large majority of nations within the Western Hemisphere, Sweden has yet to honor financial giving to non-profit organizations and charities within the tax-deductable context of our (heavy) taxing system. I recognize that there are a number of issues we need to deal with: what is the real motivation behind the giving? Would people give more, what would be the effect of giving on the needs and issues that we face in our society? If we only would count in effectiveness and cold figures we have to balance both sides of motivation for giving, namely: generosity and financial advantage.

The whole issue of support of non-profit organizations and charities is not enhanced by the different cases of bribery, misuse and abuse of power of those within some of these organizations and churches. Scams, bad management and high-rising administrations costs have made the general public (and giver) suspicious of the intensions and priorities of these organizations.

Eva Nordström of Tankesmedjan Sektor 3, which has conducted research on the consequences and changes of a possible tax deduction, has communicated that 30% of the population (16 years and older) would start to give or increase their giving if part of their financial support could be considered tax deductable. 12% said they are not yet giving to such causes at the moment. These figures imply that 900,000 new “givers” could be part to support causes that would benefit our society. Another 1,3 million people would increase their giving!

Of course we have to realize that some people consider us as national traitors if we would give donations (according to Johan Vamstad), as if we were trying to create another, (American) model as to institutionalize donations as a part of our welfare state!

So why would we give? In research done in other countries 85% of the contributors gave as reason that they wanted to be part of improving the welfare of others. Different motives could be retraced from the survey: some had religious motivations by giving to those who had less, others because they identified with the cause, again others want to “give back” – at the same time at surveys in the US 20% made clear that they used the tax deduction as a reason to give since it gave them advantages. No matter their motivation let us remember that it leaves another 80% with a healthy and good motivation. To give some perspective; Americans give at a level four times that of Britain and Germany.

So some of the questions are still the same: Are we greedy or generous?

A fact that surfaced clearly is that households in which members volunteer for charitable causes or at their church give more than twice as much money to charities than households with no volunteers!

Another point of interest to be considered: Should we count voluntarily time investments as another tax-deductable items in our attempt to create equality and justice for all within this system? Many people give many hours a week for good causes and “Time is money” after all!

I hope you realize that I am joking about this latter issue; I, together with my wife, will continue to give, not only the 10% of our income to the ministry of the church to which we belong, we give beyond that, not because we must, not because we are expected, or to gain something. We give, because we have learned the secret that it is better to give then to receive; we have learned how giving enriches life! It’s a joy!

If, against all odds we will have the opportunity for tax-deductible financial support to charities and non-profit organizations, we will be able to give more… so, more joy will be added to our family!

That’s the Way we see it!

John